Sports

Closing Arguments Ahead In Clemens Case

View Comments
Galleries

cheer thumb Closing Arguments Ahead In Clemens CaseNFL Cheerleaders

cows Closing Arguments Ahead In Clemens CaseCowboys Cheerleaders

mavs dancers 4 10 10002570231 Closing Arguments Ahead In Clemens Case

Mavs Dancers

victoria thumb Closing Arguments Ahead In Clemens Case

Victoria's Secret Fashion Show

dfw Closing Arguments Ahead In Clemens CaseBest Young Athlete In DFW?

WASHINGTON (AP) - After eight weeks, jurors are finally getting to hear closing arguments in the Roger Clemens perjury trial Tuesday, and they are expected to begin deliberations later in the day.

U.S. District Judge Reggie Walton said Tuesday he would allow jurors to consider one of the false statements Clemens is alleged to have made to Congress in his 2008 deposition, about whether he was at a pool party hosted by then-teammate Jose Canseco on June 9, 1998. The day before, the judge had said he would consider tossing the alleged false statement, in which Clemens said he was not at Canseco’s house on or around that day.

“I will permit it to go the jury, although I have some concerns,” Walton said Tuesday, before jurors entered the room.

Prosecutors have connected Clemens’ alleged attendance to steroids use in vague terms: Clemens’ chief accuser, his former strength coach, Brian McNamee, testified he saw Clemens talking at the party to Canseco, identified to the jury as a steroids user, and a third man, just days before Clemens allegedly asked McNamee for a first injection of steroids.

Clemens’ denial of being at Canseco’s house is one of 13 alleged Clemens lies cited in the count charging the former baseball pitcher with obstructing Congress. Clemens also is charged with two counts of perjury and three counts of making false statements for denying he took steroids or human growth hormone.

Last week, Debbie Clemens tried to bolster her husband’s version of events when she said the two of them went golfing on the day of the party. But she also testified that the family had stayed at Canseco’s house the night before, and came by the house after the party concluded.

On Monday, the defense made it official that Roger Clemens would not take the stand. With the jury out of the room, Clemens came up to the podium, leaned in, and told Walton in a deep Texas drawl, “Yes, sir, I am not testifying.”

Walton asked him if he had a chance to discuss the decision with his lawyers.

“Yes, judge, I sure have,” Clemens said.

Jurors will have to digest and process 26 days of testimony from 46 witnesses. Barring a quick verdict, they’ll take a four-day break after Wednesday, because the judge has an out-of-town commitment. When they return next week, one of the jurors is scheduled to leave for a six-month trip to Germany.

With that in mind, Walton shuffled the jury lineup. He decided to designate the Germany-bound juror as the alternate, and promote the final alternate — an avid cyclist who said during jury selection that he knows people who use steroids and thinks they’re a “pretty stupid thing to do.”

The defense used its final witness to try to discredit McNamee, who testified that he injected the former pitcher with steroids in 1998, 2000 and 2001 and with HGH in 2000. He is the only witness to claim firsthand knowledge of Clemens’ use of performance-enhancing drugs, and Clemens’ lawyers devoted much of the trial to attacking his integrity.

Jerry Laveroni, the former security director for the New York Yankees, said of McNamee, “I don’t believe he could be believed under oath.”

Laveroni, who overlapped with Clemens and McNamee in 2000 and 2001, said he was around McNamee every day.

Hardin asked how much credibility McNamee has.

“Zero,” Laveroni replied.

The government’s rebuttal witnesses included two who already had testified in the trial. FBI toxicologist Cynthia Morris-Kukoski countered a defense expert’s opinions about the waste McNamee said he stored in and around a crumpled beer can after an alleged steroids injection of Clemens in 2001. The defense has repeatedly referred to the evidence as “garbage.”

“One man’s garbage,” Morris-Kukoski’s said, “is another man’s find.”

The combative nature of the trial was exemplified by the testimony of Ed Blake, a DNA expert from Forensic Analytical Sciences. Blake took issue with some of the opinions expressed by the defense’s DNA expert. That drew several challenges from Clemens lawyer Michael Attanasio during cross-examination.

“You’re trying to confuse this jury,” Blake told Attanasio. “And you’re trying to confuse me.”

(© Copyright 2012 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.)

Also Check Out:

View Comments