Court Rules For Texas Inmate Who Wants DNA Testing

WASHINGTON (AP) – The Supreme Court on Monday gave a glimmer of hope to a death row inmate in Texas who wants to test crime-scene evidence that he says may show he is innocent.

The court’s narrow, 6-3 ruling means that Hank Skinner, who was about an hour away from execution when the Supreme Court intervened last year, will not be put to death soon while his legal case continues.

But the decision will not necessarily result in Skinner winning the right to perform genetic testing on evidence found at the scene of the triple murder for which he received the death penalty.

Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, writing for the majority, said prison inmates may use a federal civil rights law to seek DNA testing that was not performed before their conviction. Lower federal courts had dismissed Skinner’s claims at an early stage, although other federal judges have allowed similar lawsuits to go forward in other parts of the country.

Ginsburg said it is by no means clear that Skinner can prevail in his lawsuit and actually gain access to the evidence for testing. Even if he does win in court, she said, testing the evidence “may prove exculpatory, inculpatory or inconclusive.”

Justice Clarence Thomas, joined by Justices Samuel Alito and Anthony Kennedy, said Skinner’s legal claims should have been cut off.

Skinner, 48, was convicted of killing his girlfriend and her two adult sons on New Year’s Eve 1993.

Police found him hiding in a closet in the home of a woman he knew, about three hours after the bodies were discovered. He was splattered with the blood of at least two of the victims. A trail of blood led police from the bodies to his hiding place, a few blocks away. He acknowledged being inside the house in the Texas Panhandle where the killings took place.

But other evidence was not tested at the time of Skinner’s trial, on the advice of his lawyer. The untested material includes vaginal swabs taken from the girlfriend, Twila Jean Busby, at the time of her autopsy, fingernail clippings, a knife found on the porch of Busby’s house and a second knife found in a plastic bag in the house, a towel with the second knife and a jacket next to Busby’s body,

Skinner and his new defense team say that evidence could exonerate him. The state says Skinner is trying to game the system to delay his execution.

Like almost every other state, Texas has a law that allows prisoners to do DNA testing on evidence, long after their conviction. Skinner tried and failed twice to invoke the state law to get at the evidence.

He then filed the federal lawsuit, saying that the state had deprived him of his rights by withholding access to the evidence.

The case is Skinner v. Switzer, 09-9000.

(© Copyright 2011 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.)

  • Court Rules For Texas Inmate Who Wants DNA Testing « Fort Worth News Feeds

    […] Court Rules For Texas Inmate Who Wants DNA Testing The Supreme Court has ruled that an inmate in Texas can pursue his claims to crime-scene evidence that he says may show he is innocent. Go to News Source […]

  • Alex Patterson

    Any person on death row should have DNA testing done if there is evidence to test. That should be a given. Sorry there have been too many people convicted for crimes that DNA has overturned. As a society we have to ask ourselves are we a just nation if we put people to death for crimes they didn’t commit?

  • EARS.....


  • callen

    Alex, you don’t understand. Our corrupt and lazy court system, including judges and prosecutors that pander to state politicians, all KNOW that DNA evidence exposes what a terrible job they all do, all the way up to and including the Governor. Yes, they will do everything they can on the state level to protect their jobs and get their bonuses for incompetent results. THAT IS JUST THE WAY IT IS IN AMERICA TODAY.

blog comments powered by Disqus
The Taz Show

Listen Live