Fort Worth Appellate Court Won’t Hear Tragic Drunken Driving Case

FORT WORTH (CBSDFW.COM) – Prosecutors were hoping to increase the maximum sentence for an alleged drunken driver who left a Fort Worth boy in a vegetative state. But they left court this week disappointed.

Not as disappointed, however, as the boy’s mother.

Five-year-old Abdallah Kader was left without much hope for a future in 2009 after an alleged drunken driver, named Stewart Richardson, plowed his Ford F-250 into the family’s car.

The little boy, his mother says, faces life in a vegetative state.

“He doesn’t see. He doesn’t eat. He doesn’t talk. He doesn’t do anything that a five-year-old would do,” Loubna Elharazin said.

Stewart Richardson, she says, faces up to 10 years in prison.

“I don’t think this man deserves anything less than life,” Elharazin said.

Prosecutors had hoped to increase Richardson’s maximum punishment by asking a district judge two years ago to include Richardson’s DUI charges from other states.

That judge ruled the request “invalid.”

Now, comes word from an appeals court: They won’t even consider the matter.

CBS 11 Legal Analyst, Jerry Loftin, agrees with them.

“The Fort Worth Court of Appeals did exactly the right thing. They rule over something when it’s over with. This case is not over with,” Loftin said.

That’s because Stewart Richardson hasn’t even gone to trial yet.

“What happened to my son alone should be enough to sentence this man to life. He ended my son’s life. My son has no life,” said Elharazin.

There is now a new law named after Abdallah Khader which ups the penalty to 20 years for cases like theirs. But it does not help Abdallah or his family.

Prosecutors may appeal to the Court of Criminal Appeals in Austin, which is a higher appellate court.

Prosecutors could ask them to force the Fort Worth Court of Appeals to make a decision on the initial district court’s ruling, which had quashed the request for “enhancements” or inclusion of Richardson’s out of state DUI’s.

But Loftin, said enhancements can only be considered when other felony charges are involved. Leaving him to believe Richardson’s DUI’s in other states were misdemeanors.

Meanwhile, Stewart Richardson remains in jail without a trial date.

Comments

One Comment

  1. Mad Hatter says:

    Someone with several DUI’s in state or out of state that kills, leaves anyone with no real life like this sweet kid or injures another person needs to get an automatic death penalty without a trail. It is a waste of taxpayers money to have a trial or even keep them in jail. When caught red handed where there is no doubt they are guilty we need laws that saves our money and puts them to death with no trial or appeals or jail time. Another case in point is the yahoo at Fort Hood who killed so many.
    As times change and people like this become that wreckless with other peoples lives, we need new laws. With the money this would save the state some of those cuts could be reversed.

  2. NiteNurse says:

    This guy was a multiple DUI offender. He basically ended this young man’s life and cost this family dearly not only emotionally but financially. In some countries this would mean an automatic death penality but we’re so nice in this country we just give the guy a home and take care of him. I think in cases like this the family or the victim should be able to decide the punishment.

  3. TNT says:

    I hope he gets shanked in prison and bleeds out in the prison yard, but not before he’s endured years of aggressive and violent sodomy..

  4. Yep says:

    I hope one of the prisoners disembowels him and hangs him with his own intestines. What a worthless and loathsome POS.

Comments are closed.

More From CBS Dallas / Fort Worth

Drip Pan: CBS Local App
Drip Pan: Weather App

Listen Live